Secrets

Sunday, May 30, 2010

The Suppressed Link between Trinity and Lung / Skin Cancer


A six-kilogram sphere of plutonium, compressed to super criticality by explosive lenses, Trinity exploded over New Mexico with a force equal to approximately 20,000 tons of TNT. Within seconds, billions of deadly radioactive particles were sucked into the atmosphere to an altitude of six miles, where high-speed jet streams could circulate them far and wide. The American Government knew about the radiation in advance, was well aware of its lethal effects on humans, but bluntly ordered the test with a complete disregard for health and welfare. In law, this was culpable gross negligence, but the American Government did not care.Sooner or later, one way or the other, they would find another culprit for any long-term effects suffered by Americans and other citizens in local and more remote areas.
If a single microscopic radioactive fallout particle lands on your skin at the beach, you get skin cancer.Inhale a single particle of the same lethal muck, and death from lung cancer becomes inevitable, unless you happen to be an exceptionally lucky cigarette smoker.
The solid microscopic radioactive particle buries itself deep in the lung tissue, completely overwhelms the body’s limited reserves of vitamin B17, and causes rampant uncontrollable cell multiplication.
There are more than a million lethal doses per kilogram, meaning that your governments have contaminated your atmosphere with more than 715,000,000,000 [715 Billion] such doses, enough to cause lung or skin cancer 117 times in every man, woman and child on earth. Before you ask, no, the radioactive particles do not just “fade away”, at least not in your lifetime or that of your children and grandchildren. With a half-life of 50,000 years or longer, these countless trillions of deadly government-manufactured radioactive particles are essentially with you forever.
Circulated around the world by powerful jet streams, these particles are deposited at random, though in higher concentrations within a couple of thousand miles of the original test sites. A simple wind or other surface disturbance is all that is needed to stir them up again and create enhanced dangers for those in the vicinity. The once-innocent activity of playfully kicking sand around on the beach in summer could nowadays easily translate to suicide, if you happen to stir up a few radioactive particles that could stick to your skin or be inhaled into your lungs.
You may ask yourselves if you have been told the truth with regards to lung and skin cancer.
Skin cancer is caused by the sun, everyone knows that.
Lung cancer is caused by smoking, everyone knows that too.
But…
By the end of official atmospheric testing in 1963, the incidence of lung cancer in the Pacific Islands had increased fivefold since 1945.
Having screwed (our) environment completely for 50,000 years, it was time for “big government” to start taking heavy diversionary action. How could people be convinced to be causing themselves to contract lung cancer, i.e. be said to be guilty of a self inflicted injury for which government could never be blamed or sued?
The only obvious substance that people inhaled into their lungs, apart from air, was tobacco smoke, so the government boot was put in. (Ed: please note the time line)
Poorly qualified medical “researchers” suddenly found themselves overwhelmed with massive government grants all aimed at achieving the same end-result: “Prove that smoking causes lung cancer”.
Real scientists (especially some notable nuclear physicists) smiled grimly at the early pathetic efforts of the fledgling anti-smoking lobby, and lured them into the deadliest trap of all.
Government needed a scapegoat for the spectacular rise in lung cancer in the late fifties, and boy did they find one.
The quasi-medical researchers were invited to prove their false claims under exactly the same rigid scientific rules that were used when proving that radioactive particles cause lung cancer in mammals. Remember, for any theory to be accepted scientifically, it must first be proven in accordance with rigorous requirements universally agreed by scientists.
First the suspect agent (tobacco smoke) must be isolated, then used in properly controlled laboratory experiments to produce the claimed result, i.e. lung cancer in mammals.
Despite exposing literally tens of thousands of especially vulnerable mice and rats to the equivalent of 200 cigarettes per day for years on end, “medical science” has never once managed to induce lung cancer in any mouse or rat.
Tongue in cheek perhaps, Professor Schrauzer, President of the International Association of Bio-Inorganic Chemists, testified before a U.S. congressional committee in 1982 that it had long been well known to scientists that certain constituents of tobacco smoke act as anti-carcinogens (anti-cancer agents) in test animals. He continued that when known carcinogens (cancer causing substances) are applied to the animals, the application of constituents of cigarette smoke counter them.
Nor did Professor Schrauzer stop there.
He further testified on oath to the committee that “no ingredient of cigarette smoke has been shown to cause human lung cancer”, adding that “no-one has been able to produce lung cancer in laboratory animals from smoking.”
But how on earth does smoking protect you from the radioactive particle fallout?
Well…
Professor Sterling of the Simon Fraser University in Canada is perhaps closest to the truth, where he uses research papers to reason that smoking promotes the formation of a thin mucous layer in the lungs, “which forms a protective layer stopping any cancer-carrying particles from entering the lung tissue.” This is probably as close as we can get to the truth at present, and it does make perfect scientific sense.
Deadly radioactive particles inhaled by a smoker would initially be trapped by the mucous layer, and then be ejected from the body before they could enter the tissue.
Now this does raise my eyebrows, because this would explain the mystery of why the Elite really want us to stop smoking. I could never find a decent explanation for the fact that they so desperatly want us to quit. Well, I think I have found it.
The thin mucous layer does not only protect against nuclear particles, it also prevents other particles floating in the atmosphere from penetrating the lung tissue. Particles like aluminum, thorium, barium. Ring a bell? Yes. Chemtrails.
To end on a lighter note:
All of this may be a bit depressing for non-smokers, but there are probably one or two things you can do to minimize the risks as far as possible. Rather than shy away from smokers in your local pub or club, get as close as you can and breathe in their expensive second-hand smoke. Go on, don’t be shy, suck in a few giant breaths. Or perhaps you could smoke one cigarette or small cigar after each meal, just three a day to build up a thin boundary mucous layer.”
Source
Attribution: Truth4hire

Water or Coke?

I could not believe this.....  Very interesting
 


                   


 WATER 

#1.   75% of Americans are chronically dehydrated.
  (Likely applies to half the world population)


 

#2.     In 37% of Americans, the thirst mechanism is so weak
 that it is mistaken for hunger.

 

#3.   Even MILD dehydration will slow down one's metabolism as 3%.

 


#4.  One glass of water will shut down midnight hunger pangs
    for almost 100% of the dieters studied in a University of
Washington  study. 

 

#5.     Lack of water, the #1 trigger of daytime fatigue.

 

#6.   Preliminary research indicates that 8-10 glasses of
      water a day could significantly ease back and joint pain
 for up to 80% of sufferers.


 

#7.   A mere 2% drop in body water can trigger fuzzy short-term
      memory, trouble with basic math, and difficulty focusing on
 the computer screen or on a printed page. 

 

#8..   Drinking 5 glasses of water daily decreases the risk of
    colon cancer by 45%, plus it can slash the risk of breast
 cancer by 79%., and one is 50% less likely to develop
 bladder cancer. Are you drinking the amount of water
 you should drink every day? 

 


COKE

 
 #1.   In many states the highway patrol carries
      two gallons of Coke in the trunk to remove blood from
 the highway after a car accident
.
 


#2.     You can put a T-bone steak in a bowl of Coke
 and it will be gone in two days.

 

#3.    To clean a toilet: Pour a can of Coca-Cola into the
    toilet bowl and let the 'real thing' sit for one hour,
 then flush clean. The citric acid in Coke removes
 stains from vitreous china. 
 

#4.   To remove rust spots from chrome car bumpers:
      Rub the bumper with a rumpled-up piece of Reynolds
 Wrap aluminum foil dipped in Coca-Cola.

 


#5.   To clean corrosion from car battery terminals: Pour
     a can of Coca-Cola over the terminals to bubble
 away the corrosion. 
 

#6.  To loosen a rusted bolt: Apply a cloth soaked in Coca-Cola
 to the rusted bolt for several minutes. 
 

#7.   To bake a moist ham: Empty a can of Coca-Cola into
  the baking pan, wrap the ham in aluminum foil, and bake.
 Thirty minutes before ham is finished, remove the foil, allowing the drippings to mix
 with the Coke for a sumptuous brown gravy.

 


#8...  To remove grease from clothes: Empty a can of Coke
  into the load of greasy clothes, add detergent, and run
 through a regular cycle. The Coca-Cola will help loosen
 grease stains. It will also clean road haze from your
 windshield. 
 

FOR YOUR INFORMATION: 
  #1     the active ingredient in Coke is phosphoric acid.
 It will dissolve a nail in about four days. Phosphoric
 acid also leaches calcium from bones and is a major
 contributor to the rising increase of osteoporosis.

 #2.   To carry Coca-Cola syrup! (the concentrate) the
 commercial trucks must use a hazardous Material place
 cards reserved for highly corrosive materials.

 #3.   The distributors of Coke have been using it to clean
 engines of the trucks for about 20 years!    Now the question is, would you like a glass of water? 

or Coke?      

 Quick! Send this helpful info on to your friends health conscious or not!!!!  

Friday, May 28, 2010

ALIEN CHIP IN NAPOLEON’S SKULL

PARIS – Scientists examining the remains of  Napoleon Bonaparte admit they are “deeply puzzled” by the discovery of a half-inch long microchip embedded in his skull.

They say the mysterious object could be an alien implant – suggesting that the French emperor was once abducted by a UFO!
“The possible ramifications of this discovery are almost too enormous to comprehend,” declared Dr. Andre Dubois, who made the astonishing revelation in a French medical journal.
“Until now, every indication has been that victims of alien abduction are ordinary people who play no role in world events.
“Now we have compelling evidence that extraterrestrials acted in the past to influence human history – and may continue to do so!”
Dr. Dubois made the amazing find while studying Napoleon’s exhumed skeleton on a $140,000 grant from the French government.
“I was hoping to learn whether he suffered from a pituitary disorder that contributed to his small stature,” he explained.
But instead the researcher found something far more extraordinary: “As I examined the interior of the skull, my hand brushed across a tiny protrusion.
“I then looked at the area under a magnifying glass – and was stunned to find that the object was some kind of super-advanced microchip.”
From the extent of bone growth around the chip, the expert believes it was implanted when Bonaparte was young.
“Napoleon vanished from sight for a period of several days in July 1794, when he was 25. He later claimed he’d been held prisoner during the Themidorian coup – but no record of that arrest exists. I believe that is when the abduction took place.”
From that time on, Napoleon’s rise was meteoric. By the next year, he’d been put in charge of the French army in Italy.
Miraculously, he was able to transform starving, rag-tag troops into a top-notch fighting force and to crush the Italians.
In 1804,  after a string of startling victories, the pint-size general crowned himself emperor of France – and his empire soon expanded to include what is now Germany and Austria, as well as Switzerland, Italy and Denmark.
“Napoleon used military strategies more than a hundred years ahead of his time,” said Dr. Dubois. “Perhaps the implant somehow enhanced his abilities.”
The implant could also explain Napoleon’s famous habit of holding his hand over his heart, he added.
“It’s possible that the device affected the electrical signals from his brain to his heart.”
By the time of his defeat by the British at Waterloo in 1815, Napoleon had altered the face of Europe.
“What Western history would have been like had the aliens not intervened, we can only guess,” observed Dr. Dubois. “Thus we cannot know whether they acted to help mankind or harm us.”

A REAL Cure For ALL Cancers! Capsaicin- Here's The Recipe...


I have a close friend that was recently diagnosed with Stage 4 lung cancer, this set in motion my quest for a "natural" solution to his potentially fatal problem. While In conversation with an old friend one day a passerby overhead the details of our discussion which at the time happened to be about my friends lung cancer. This gentleman went on to say that he had literally just cured his wife after 4 weeks from fatal Leukemia, the doctors are baffled he continued. He suggested I do some research on Capsaicin, that's what I did and guess what I found?
A TON of scientific evidence to back up his claim, it really appears that this miracle ingredient can kill the cancer cells, disrupt their mitochondria so they literally turn on themselves without damaging the surrounding healthy cells. Do a quick Google search for yourself and you will see exactly what I'm talking about. Needless to say, my friend will be starting his regime in the next day or two...I will keep you updated as to the results. "Kelley Eidem, the “inventor” of a novel “recipe” to erase cancerous tumors, is the accomplished author of what I consider a very important book, The Doctor Who Cures Cancer. The physician whose outstanding achievements and lifework are thoroughly covered in this work* is Dr. Emanuel Revici who from my impression stands heads and shoulders above possibly all others who have gone before
Based upon what Kelley Eidem had learned when researching and writing his book on the life work of Dr. Revici, he devised a simple formula that (coupled with the serene conviction that he could do it) helped him heal stage 4 cancer in a matter of a few weeks. This was over a decade ago.
While he adds that "... curing deadly cancer is probably almost as easy as curing deadly scurvy, the results are still early". He does have some impressive responses from several people both with cancer and other afflictions who have tried his "recipe" with varying degrees of success.
Of course, as in many if not most cancer cures, the power of the mind as expressed in the will to live and confidence in the healing power of the human body has surely played a minor (or major) part in these improvements as well (compare stories illustrating the dramatic impact of the well-known placebo effect).
Here is Kelley Eidem's short (but anything but sweet!) recipe.
(1) Freshly grate one habaneros pepper each day and put it on bread (persons unable to tolerate peppers can substitute freshly grated ginger (never from a jar).
(2) Freshly grate two cloves of garlic each day and put them on bread (since the "potent active ingredients from the peppers and the garlic disperse quickly... they must be grated each day, and eaten immediately". The bread used by Eidem was high quality Ezekiel sprouted bread [possibly found in the freezer section of health food stores]
3) Take 1-2 tablespoons of emulsified cod liver oil [or in certain cases evening primrose oil, see further details below] each day.
(4) Smother the grated garlic and habaneros peppers with real butter and eat it. No margarines of any type. The use of both hot peppers (which contain capsaicin) and garlic as well as ginger is actually backed up by "mainstream" scientific research as all of these have been found to have anti-cancer activity, to wit for instance the article "How spicy foods can kill cancers" found at
"Pepper Component Hot Enough To Trigger Suicide In Prostate Cancer Cells" published at
www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/39744.php
Cod liver oil and evening primrose oil respectively are described as helping to balance an "off-balance" metabolism. Which of these oils to ingest depends on whether a person's metabolism is too anabolic or too catabolic. This is based on Dr. Revici's discovery of the "dualistic" nature of cancer.
According to Dr. Revici's observations and research results cancer is caused by an imbalance between constructive ("anabolic") and destructive ("catabolic") bodily processes and hence only able to "thrive" in a person whose metabolism is out of balance, namely either too anabolic or too catabolic.
Whether your metabolism is one or the other can be deduced and/or determined by observation of your "pain pattern" and/or by your reaction to ingesting (certain) foods as well as other factors such as urine pH as observed over the longer term.
For instance someone who has “overly alkaline” urine, fluid retention, sunken eyes, diarrhea, inability to sleep, loses weight and appetite, or has a drop in his or her blood pressure, shows typical evidence of a catabolic imbalance, while someone suffering from high blood pressure, sleepiness, frequent urination, constipation and “overly acidic” urine displays symptoms of being too anabolic. Depending on which imbalance is present, the person with cancer will have a pH (measured from urine) which is either too high or too low in a rather consistent manner (this in contradistinction to a healthy person whose pH will markedly fluctuate in the course of the day). To help correct a catabolic imbalance, Kelley Eidem suggests using evening primrose oil, while taking emulsified cod liver oil is indicated for those who are too anabolic. Since most people seem to be too acidic which according to Kelley Eidem "translates into being too anabolic if they stay too acidic too long", the standard recipe listed above features taking emulsified cod liver oil. As you can see, taking the oil indicated for you is a central part of this natural treatment approach."

Source: abovetopsecrets.com

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

A Cure for Cancer but your not being told about it – DCA

A Cure for Cancer but your not being told about it – DCA
Did you know there has been a cure for most cancers available for a few years now? If you didn’t know that you have to ask why you don’t. Is it more media manipulation and profits that really run the medical world?
The only Doom in this article is for the Big Pharmacutical Companiesprofits so please spread this to everyone you know as everyone needs to know about it.
Cancer remains the main cause of death in both men and women and those that find a cure would be made into Gods. Of course there are a lot of expensive drugs and treatments out there to slow down the effects and also to boost the big drug companies coffers, it makes you wonder if these big companies will ever truly “develop” a miracle cure. Well actually the cure for most cancers is already out there and has been for sometime but they will not tell you that!
Before we get into the cures lets look at why they wont tell us the truth, here’s a hint – Its all about MONEY.In general, oncologists make money by providing chemotherapy, even when it has little chance of success.“There’s pretty good evidence at this point,” said Dr. Richard Deyo, professor of medicine at the University of Washington and an expert on health care spending, “that there are plenty of patients for whom there’s little hope, who are terminally ill, whom chemotherapy is not going to help, who get chemotherapy.”
Ari Straus, the chief operating officer of Aurora Healthcare Consulting, which works with doctors to increase their profits, said Medicare’s changes had squeezed oncologists. “Five years ago, many physicians were earning over $1 million per year on drug sales alone,” Mr. Straus said.
Dr. Robert Geller, who worked as an oncologist in private practice from 1996 to 2005 said that as long as oncologists continue to be paid by the procedure instead of for spending time with patients, they will find ways to game the system, however much money they make or lose on prescribing drugs. “People go where the money is, and you’d like to believe it’s different in medicine, but it’s really no different in medicine,” Dr. Geller said. “When you start thinking of oncology as a business, then all these decisions make sense.”
That’s just a small sample from doctors. Many people believe that pharmaceutical companies’ hunger for profits triumphs over their desire to genuinely help the public, and that this blinded concern for profit above all has shaped — and continues to shape — mainstream medicine as we know it. This has implications that are more serious than one might initially think, especially considering the heavy role that pharmaceutical companies play in mainstream medicine. “Deep Healing” author Dr. Emmette Miller writes, “We have to remember that most medical research in this country is financed by pharmaceutical companies who are looking for new drugs they can produce and sell.
The research on this is massive but lets get to the point. Just have a look at some of the big names set to profit from TAMIFLU – Cheney, Rumsfeld….. what more needs to be said! It shows you that things are manipulated.
The Cure for most Cancers -Dichloroacetic Acid – DCA
It sounds almost too good to be true: a cheap and simple drug that kills almost all cancers by switching off their “immortality”. The drug, dichloroacetate (DCA), has already been used for years to treat rare metabolic disorders and so is known to be relatively safe.
Evangelos Michelakis of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and his colleagues tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body and found that it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but not healthy cells. Tumours in rats deliberately infected with human cancer also shrank drastically when they were fed DCA-laced water for several weeks.
DCA attacks a unique feature of cancer cells: the fact that they make their energy throughout the main body of the cell, rather than in distinct organelles called mitochondria. This process, called glycolysis, is inefficient and uses up vast amounts of sugar.
Until now it had been assumed that cancer cells used glycolysis because their mitochondria were irreparably damaged. However, Michelakis’s experiments prove this is not the case, because DCA reawakened the mitochondria in cancer cells. The cells then withered and died.
Dichloroacetic acid, often abbreviated DCA, is a chemical compound, an acid, and an analogue of acetic acid in which two of the three hydrogen atoms of the methyl group have been replaced by chlorine atoms.
DCA can cause pain, numbness and gait disturbances in some patients, but this may be a price worth paying if it turns out to be effective against all cancers. The next step is to run clinical trials of DCA in people with cancer. These may have to be funded by charities, universities and governments: pharmaceutical companies are unlikely to pay because they can’t make money on unpatented medicines.
The pay-off is that if DCA does work, it will be easy to manufacture and dirt cheap. DCA is non-patentable as a compound, though a patent has been filed for its use in cancer treatment.
Get your google out and get the full facts behind DCA, everyone should know about it.
Source:http://www.doomdaily.com/2009/a-cure-for-cancer-but-your-not-being-told-about-it-dca/#comment-6216